Regulation

DOJ, Wall Street and DeFi firms back lawsuit against Illinois' 0.2% crypto tax

Published · PlainBTC · United States · ~5 min
DOJ, Wall Street and DeFi firms back lawsuit against Illinois' 0.2% crypto tax

An unusual alliance has lined up against a first-of-its-kind state crypto tax. The U.S. Justice Department, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Wall Street lobby SIFMA and a group of crypto companies led by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Paradigm and Uniswap have filed court papers supporting a lawsuit to strike down Illinois' Digital Asset Tax Act, Decrypt reported.

The law charges 0.2% of a digital asset's full value each time an Illinois customer trades, transfers or stores it through a broker. It applies even when there is no sale, no profit and no change in who owns the asset. Illinois agreed in October to pause the tax until July 1, 2027 while the court fight plays out.

Key takeaways

  • Illinois' Digital Asset Tax Act would charge 0.2% of the full value of crypto each time it is traded, transferred or stored through a broker.
  • The Justice Department filed a statement of interest on Nov. 6 calling the tax vague and discriminatory.
  • The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and SIFMA, plus a DeFi coalition including a16z, Paradigm, Uniswap, Aave Labs and Chainlink Labs, filed briefs backing the lawsuit.
  • The tax is paused until July 1, 2027, so nobody pays it today.

What the Illinois tax does

The law was enacted in June. Unlike an income tax, which you pay on profits, this levy is based on the value of the asset itself. As a simple example, 0.2% of a $1,000 bitcoin purchase is $2, and the same rate would apply again if you later moved those coins to another account through a broker.

Illinois has no comparable tax on dollars, gold or stocks, and no other state has a tax like it, according to the Blockchain Association. The governor's budget office projected the tax would raise $60 million in fiscal year 2027, Cointelegraph reported. Illinois House Speaker Emanuel "Chris" Welch promoted it as part of a push to make "big tech companies and crypto billionaires pay their fair share," the Chicago Tribune reported in July, according to Cointelegraph.

Timeline: in July the Digital Chamber sued Illinois officials; in August the Blockchain Association and Crypto Council for Innovation filed a second challenge; in October Illinois agreed to pause the tax until July 1, 2027; on Nov. 6 the DOJ, U.S. Chamber of Commerce and SIFMA backed the challenge; on Nov. 11 a DeFi coalition led by a16z, Paradigm and Uniswap filed a brief
Source: Cointelegraph; Decrypt; Blockchain Association

Who is fighting it, and why

The legal challenge started in summer. The Digital Chamber sued Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and state revenue official David Harris in July. The Blockchain Association and the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) filed a separate challenge in August in Sangamon County Circuit Court. On Nov. 4, they asked the judge to decide the case and strike the tax down for good.

On Nov. 6, the Justice Department filed a statement of interest. It argued the tax undermines federal policy on digital assets and pointed to the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and the GENIUS Act stablecoin law, Cointelegraph reported. The same day, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and SIFMA, which represents broker-dealers, banks and asset managers, filed a brief warning that the tax would also hit traditional banks and custodians that offer crypto. "This means that a customer who loses money owes the same tax as a customer who earns a profit," their filing said.

On Nov. 11, a coalition led by the DeFi Education Fund, a16z, Paradigm and Uniswap filed its own brief. Its members include Aave Labs, Chainlink Labs, the Solana Policy Institute, Phantom, Jito Labs, Multicoin Capital and Stand With Crypto. They argue the law's definitions are so vague that they could reach software developers and decentralized protocols that never hold customer funds.

Fact card: an estimated 2.64 million Illinois residents hold digital assets, the fifth-highest total of any state, according to the DeFi coalition's brief; the tax is 0.2% of an asset's full value
Source: DeFi coalition brief, via Decrypt

The challengers say the tax breaks the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act and the U.S. Constitution's limits on state taxes that burden interstate commerce. "This tax is unclear, discriminatory, unconstitutional, and harmful to the future of finance," CCI CEO Ji Hun Kim and Blockchain Association executive Ashok Pinto said in a joint statement.

What it means for beginners

If you live outside Illinois, this tax does not apply to you. If you live in Illinois, nothing is charged today, because the tax is paused until July 1, 2027. The bigger question is whether other states copy the idea. A ruling against Illinois would make that less likely; a ruling for the state could encourage similar proposals.

Taxes are one more reason to keep track of every buy, sell and transfer you make. If you are starting out, a regulated U.S. exchange such as Coinbase shows your transaction history and fees in one place, which makes tax time easier. Check current terms on its site before you sign up, and only invest what you can afford to lose. This is not tax or investment advice.

What to watch next

Read how Washington is reshaping crypto oversight: Trump names four SEC and CFTC nominees, including a replacement for crypto advocate Hester Peirce.

Partner offer Referral bonus after your first qualifying buy within 90 days of verifying your ID. Amount varies by country.

Sign up on Coinbase

Referral link, we may earn a bonus. Details

Disclosure: This page contains River and Coinbase referral links. If you sign up through one of them and meet that provider’s current terms, PlainBTC may earn a referral reward at no extra cost to you. See our full affiliate disclosure.

Not financial advice. This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not investment, trading, legal, or tax advice. Cryptocurrency is volatile and you can lose money. Do your own research and consider speaking with a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

Sources

  1. Decrypt: Illinois Crypto Tax Draws Unlikely Alliance of DOJ, Banks and DeFi (Nov 12, 2026)
  2. Cointelegraph: US Justice Department, business groups and DeFi firms challenge Illinois crypto tax (Nov 12, 2026)
  3. Blockchain Association: Motion for summary judgment asking court to strike down Illinois Digital Asset Tax (Nov 4, 2026)
  4. U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Chamber of Digital Commerce v. Harris; Blockchain Association v. Harris (Nov 6, 2026)